Analisis Hasil Evaluasi Diri Mahasiswa Tentang Kurikulum Pendidikan Profesi Guru Kelas SD Prajabatan Bersubsidi Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Abstract
Abstrak
Guru telah menjadi salah satu profesi yang menjanjikan dan banyak diminati belakangan ini. Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) adalah cara pemerintah melakukan seleksi dan pembinaan guru profesional yang mampu mendukung tercapainya tujuan pendidikan nasional. Namun, terdapat beberapa ketidaksesuaian perencanaan dan pelaksanaan program PPG. Diperlukan evaluasi diri yang dapat menganalisis program PPG Prajabatan Besubsidi. Hasil analisis evaluasi diri mahasiswa PPG akan mampu mengidentifikasi masalah yang terjadi secara nyata hingga pada akhirnya dapat menunjang perbaikan program.
Penelitian ini menggunakan deskriptif kualitatif dengan metode survei menyeluruh. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah survei online menggunakan google form dengan indikator evaluasi diri mahasiswa tentang analisis kurikulum PPG Prajabatan. Indikator dikembangkan dari Panduan PPG 2017 sebagai bagian dari prinsip penjaminan mutu program. Hasil analisis evaluasi diri mahasiswa PPG Prajabatan Bersubsidi Guru Kelas SD UKSW adalah: 1) terdapat 78,2% mahasiswa yang belum memahami dengan jelas kelengkapan kurikulum PPG Prajabatan yang ada; 2) sebesar 52,7% mahasiswa bingung dalam memahami regulasi kurikulum PPG; 3) baru 40% mahasiswa berhasil memahami isi undang-undang yang berkaitan dengan guru professional Indonesia; 4) sebesar 65,5% mahasiswa aktif dalam membahas tentang arah perkembangan guru professional Indonesia. Tulisan ini sebagai langkah awal untuk melakukan penelitian lebih lanjut yang terkait dengan analisis kurikulum PPG Prajabatan.
Kata kunci: evaluasi diri, pendidikan profesi guru
Abstract
Teachers have become one of the interesting professions lately. Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) is the way the government conducts selection and fostering professional teachers who are able to support the achievement of national education goals. However, there are some discrepancies in the planning and implementation of the PPG program. Self-evaluation is needed which can analyze the PPG program. The results of PPG student self-evaluation analysis will be able to identify problems that occur in a real way so that they can ultimately support the improvement of the program.
This study uses descriptive qualitative with a comprehensive survey method. The instrument used in this study is an online survey using google form with indicators of student self-evaluation about the analysis of the curriculum of PPG Prajabatan. Indicators are developed from the 2017 PPG Guide as part of the program quality assurance principle. The results of the self evaluation of the UKSW’s PPG students are: 1) there are 78.2% of students who have not clearly understood the completeness of the existing PPG Prajabatan curriculum; 2) 52.7% of students are confused in understanding PPG curriculum regulation; 3) only 40% of students successfully understand the contents of the law relating to Indonesian professional teachers; 4) 65.5% of students are active in discussing the direction of the development of Indonesian professional teachers. This paper is the first step to conduct further research related to the analysis of the curriculum of PPG Prajabatan.
Keywords: self-evaluation, pendidikan profesi guru
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Daftar Pustaka
Airlanda, G.S. 2016. Analisis Kualitas Pendidikan Ditinjau dari Penerapan Kebijakan Sekolah Gratis di SMA Negeri 1 Weru Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (JPS) Volume 4 No. 1 halaman 43-50.
BAN-PT. 2017. Buku IV Pedoman Evaluasi Diri: Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi. Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi: Jakarta
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. 2011. Evaluation for Improving Student Outcomes: Messages for Quality Assurance Policies. Publications office of the European Union. (online), http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/4107_en.pdf. Diakses 12 Desember 2018. DOI: 10.2801/96579
Guerriero, S. 2014. Teacher’s Pedagogical Knowledge and the Teaching Profession: Background Report and Project Objectives. OECD. (online), http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/Background_document_to_Symposium_ITEL-FINAL.pdf. Diakses 12 Desember 2018
Hernawan, A.H., Susilana, R. 2016. Konsep Dasar Kurikulum. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (online), http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FIP/JUR._PEND._LUAR_BIASA/196209061986011-AHMAD_MULYADIPRANA/PDF/Konsep_Dasar_Kurikulum.pdf. Diakses 12 Desember 2018
Kuiper, W., Nieveen, N., Berkvens, J. 2013. Curriculum Regulation and Freedom in the Netherlands- A Puzzling Paradox. Orational address. Enschede/Utrecht: SLO/Utrecht University. (online) https://www.google.com/search?safe=strict&ei=nVEWXIKPHYekyAOeqKDYBQ&q=Kuiper%2C+W.%2C+Nieveen%2C+N.%2C+Berkvens%2C+J.+2013.+Curriculum+Regulation+and+Freedom+in+the+Netherlands-+A+Puzzling+Paradox.+&oq=Kuiper%2C+W.%2C+Nieveen%2C+N.%2C+Berkvens%2C+J.+2013.+Curriculum+Regulation+and+Freedom+in+the+Netherlands-+A+Puzzling+Paradox.+&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i71l8.348064.348064..349176...0.0..0.0.0.......0....1j2..gws-wiz.EWqi0_g9aU4#. Diakses 12 Desember 2018
Leeuw, E., Hox, J., Dillman, D. 2013. International Handbook of Survey Methodology. European Assosiation of Methodology. (online), http://www.eam-online.org. diakses 7 Desember 2018
Lembaga Administrasi Negara. 2016. Modul Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Dasar Kader PNS: “Pelayanan Publik”. Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia: Jakarta. (online), http://pusbindiklat.lipi.go.id/wp-content/uploads/MODUL-PELAYANAN-PUBLIK-CETAK.pdf. Diakses 12 Desember 2018
Ntim, S. 2017. Transforming Teaching and Learning for Quality Teacher Education in Ghana: Perspectives from Selected Teacher Trainees and Stakeholders in Teacher Education. International Journal of Education Vol 9 No.3. DOI: 10.5296/ije.v9i3.11686
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 Tahun 2008. Guru. Presiden Republik Indonesia. (online) https://unnes.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/PP_74_Tahun_2008.pdf. Diakses 11 Desember 2018
Permendiknas Nomor 16 Tahun 2007. Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Menteri Pendidikan Nasional republic Indonesia. (online) https://www.slideshare.net/kreasi_cerdik/permendiknas-nomor-16-tahun-2007. Diakses 11 Desember 2018
Permendiknas Nomor 87 Tahun 2013. Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru Prajabatan. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (online), https://www.google.com/search?q=Peraturan+Menteri+Pendidikan+dan+Kebudayaan+Nomor+87+Tahun+2013&oq=Peraturan+Menteri+Pendidikan+dan+Kebudayaan+Nomor+87+Tahun+2013&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i59.1283j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#. Diakses7 Desember 2018
Priestley, M., Biesta, G.J.J., Philippou, S. & Robinson, S. 2015. The Teacher And The Curriculum: Exploring Teacher Agency. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward & J. Pandya (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment. London: SAGE Publications Ltd
RISTEKDIKTI. 2017. Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Profesi Guru. Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswan: Jakarta
RISTEKDIKTI. 2017. Pendaftaran Online PPG Prajabatan Bersubsidi Gelombang 2. Website PPG RISTEKDIKTI. (online), http://ppg.ristekdikti.go.id/daftar/. Diakses 7 Desember 2018
Saifulloh, M., Muhibbin, Z., Hermanto. 2012. Strategi Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan di Sekolah. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora (JSH) Volume 5 No.2 halaman 206-217. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v5i2.619
Santoso, M. 2013. Indonesian Qualifications Framework. Ministry of Education and Culture. (online), https://olc.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/Session%202.1_ESDP_WfD_Indonesia%20QF%20%281%29.pdf. Diakses 11 Desember 2018
Sedgwick, P. 2013. Convenience Sampling. BMJ Publishing. (online), http://www.bmj.com/permissions. Diakses 7 Desember 2018. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f6304
Sudjana. 2004. Handout Perkuliahan Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Penelitian Kualitatif. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Bandung. UPI Press
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 PAX HUMANA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN Cetak : 2337-3512 || ISSN Online : 2548-3021
Tim OJS Pax Humana 2016